Saturday, March 16, 2013

Paradesi - An Untold History, A Master Piece !



Bala comes up with yet another hard hitting dark movie of the people in margin which always had been his story telling background. Paradesi is an important film in many ways not only for its cinematic genius but also for documenting the untold history of the people of lower strata.

Paradesi has been adapted from Eriyum Panikadu, the Tamil translation of the English novel Red Tea(1969) by Dr Paul Harris Dabiel. The novel was based on the people he met during his work as a doctor in tea plantations in the Western Ghats and it could not have been told in an uncompromising manner than Paradesi. 

Paradesi captures the strikingly simple life of people who were so much in tune with the mother nature and without any exceedingly complicated expectations. It is heart breaking to see such people were taken for a ride in the name of employment. The movie starts with a simple story of people in Salur Village. Their people predominantly faces poverty everyday yet live with content. Their weddings, their satire, their food, their entertainment, their opinions..everything takes us to a entirely different world which is a typical feature of Bala's movies. He is a true creator in all ways.

The protagonist Adharva is a news announcer in the village and begs food from everyone for his everyday life and gets abused even by his own grand mother for such a life style. The relationship between him and the tomboyish Vedika makes Adharva realize the importance of making money which in turn opens up the crux of the story. During his search of an employment he gets introduced to a broker looking for coolies and eventually convinces the entire village to work in the tea estate.

The entire village is made to walk over 45 days to reach tea estates in western ghats. The grueling episodes of the tea estate is heart breaking and depressing. It is certain that those images will flash in our minds at least once before we sip a cup of tea. These things reiterates the importance of freedom time and again. The unfortunate fact is these kind of cruel capitalism still exist in many such places.

The expression of the joy in a dry village and the misery in a lush green place is probably the most challenging aspect in Paradesi and Bala as a creator comes out with flying colors. The place where the innocent people were put, their work schedule, their medical care, their food, the way they have been treated etc. everything is unbelievably heart aching and no words could capture their agony. 

A dark history captured brilliantly and the story has been told very beautifully in a linear way without any major dramatic episodes leading to a high dose, undramatic yet powerful climax which creates that inexpressible feeling and makes one's heart heavy. Bala is a legend. 

The casting is fresh as usual with Bala's films and all of them acted beautifully and to me it is just Bala's show for the command he has over story telling and movie making. Chezhiyan's cinematography, Kishore's editing and debutante CS Balachander's art direction are top class. Bala has always associated with literary world and I think that's what makes people like him more special and take the movie experience more than just a pop corn entertainer. This time he joins hands with Legendary writer Nanjil Nadan.

Ilayaraja is badly missed in Paradesi. Even though GV Prakash scored well in songs, he couldn't provide the background score without a template. Raja's music would have been on a totally different level. It is also unfair to expect GV to fill the big shoes of the Maestro. Vairamuthu's lyrics are extremely good and Bala's desire to work with him probably opted him to go away from Raja. Paradesi, deservingly, is sure to rock the festivals and awards.

Verdict - 4.5/5 Paradesi is a classic and Bala's Master Piece. Pithamagan, Naan Kadavul and Paradesi are three best movies of Bala each told in different horizon with different emotions. Paradesi can be classified as his most honest attempt till date made without any cinematic compromise and can be tainted as one of the most original and brilliant Tamil films. Bala is a pride of Tamil Cinema.


Friday, February 15, 2013

Vishwaroopam - A Kamal Hassan Show



Vishwaroopam - The most controversial movie in recent years that took beatings from all ends saw the first light in the dollar land, premiered in Los Angeles, manifested Kamal's Hollywood aspirations. Tainted to be the most expensive film in his career is just another thing for the kind of artist he is and the kind of business with which the movie industry operates in general. The inimitable ability of Kamal in trying out new things has been appreciated by one and all financially this time across the globe despite been bestowed with critical accolades for many such attempts. My experience with Vishwaroopam was lightened up by the presence of Kamal himself with his short speech before the movie was screened.

I never had any apprehensions to match Kamal as a writer/director to Kamal as an actor. Guna, Mahanadi, Anbe Sivam, Devar Magan, Virumandi, Hey Ram are few examples and is more than enough for discussion. There are many ways to convey a story and content in mainstream cinema. While some of the current generation film makers still thrive on narrating the introduction or a scene or a character in the "voice-over", Kamal chooses to convey his ideas and thoughts in his cinema via the visuals, metaphors and analogies which is probably the highest form of story telling in world cinema arena. By not understanding what he tried to convey is definitely attributed to the literacy of the audiences and not the film maker himself. There are many such complicated and intellectual angles in Vishwaroopam which I missed but later learnt via "good" film critics. I was astonished to the fact that there is so much in the movie where one could not even comprehend while watching but that certainly cannot take away the efforts that had been vested. The movie starts with the title card which is more or less still with pigeons in the background, a style adopted from Iranian/European movies especially Majid Majidi's movies. The movie really does start with the title card in the sense,  a man/jihad feeds those pigeons in the background representing the jihad inculcation/doctrines to them and then the pigeons flies across the Wall street and lands at a charging bull which represents the aggressive financial optimism and prosperity of the American economy. This represents the idea of the jihads to destroy American economy. The same scene also used in the story later about the role of pigeons in destroying the New York city via cesium. Single shot, multiple meanings.

There are two different perception about the movie, one being a pro-American and other being anti-Islam. One could very well argue both are same but the dosages certainly differ. The movie is neither of the above and in fact it is exactly opposite. To put it simply in other words, Vishwaroopam IS pro-Islam and NOT pro-American. Lets see how Kamal as a writer/director is able to achieve both. The movie had to face so many issues before its release mainly by Islamic protesters assuming and believing it is anti-Islam but Kamal has clearly distinguished between a true Muslim and a Jihad who is a so-called Muslim and that's where the understanding is or rather lack of understanding. 
  • Omar condemns the boys for entertaining the people by dancing/wearing female attire(burka) considering it as a sin; But the same Omar conspire his son to wear burka to kill the American tank.
  •  In response to Omar's angst on why he and his religion had to suffer when his village was attacked by US force, Kamal clearly take out the religion and answers it Jihadi perspective and they are Jihadis and a Jihadi's are meant to shed blood and not tears. Tears are for the religion and Muslims. 
  • When Kamal was tortured before the transformation scene, he names himself as Tafiq and then Nasir just to pay respects to those two characters. Tafiq was introduced to him as a farmer in Afghan and not a Jihad and Nasir is the youngest son of Omar who doesnt want to become a warrior underlining his liking towards true Muslims and not Jihads  When he was asked the famous question - are you a good man or bad man, Kamal responds that he has irrevocable sin written on his forehead indicating the murders of Tafiq and Nasir which he was also part of in the process of destroying Jihads representing Indian RAW agent. 
  • In the public hanging scene, everyone wear white caps indicating the prevailance of justice to the sinners while Kamal alone wears black representing sadness and according to Kuran it also represents evil. The director expresses his point very strongly that the hanging scene is an evil act done in the name of justice. 
  • The nigerian Abbasi, shaves off all his hair in the body as a part of Islamic custom performed after death to enter clean into heavens, and Omar pray before the proposed bomb detonation again as a part of the Jihadi custom to pray before killing. when a FBI officer (Israeli) asks Tom, what is Wisam doing?  He says "he is praying for you". Israeli asks "God Vadim"? Tom replies "Exactly, except it is in Arabic version" So Wisam, the Muslim prays for that Israeli too. These three guys pray to the same god, but their prayers differ. The director again differentiates the difference between a Jihad and a Muslim.
  •  A matured little boy who wants to become a doctor doesn't want to play in the swing whereas a grown up jihad trained boy wants to. One of the finest shots in the movie explaining the impossible nature of being mature due to the poison of Jihad seed. There could be other meanings to it but again its left to the intelligence of the viewers.

The director establishes all these facts to illustrate that Jihads are opportunists and do not represent true Muslims and only use Islam as a blanket to justify their deeds. Bravo Mr. Kamal Hassan. He also establishes the fact that dominance and arrogance of US over any country/culture is not welcomed by all and showing his stance on America's foreign policy. Illustrated in the below metaphors -
  • Omar's hatred towards English language, Women rights, Western Arts are clearly underlined indicating America's dominance over the unwilling/uninterested(over west) Afghans. 
  • When Afghanistan was attacked by US, the director's belief is resonated via the sound of an eagle which is the National bird of America and has the quality of eating dead bodies, representing Americans as eagles.
  • There is a dialogue between Omar and Kamal. Omar says kids who are raised up without their dad are extremely cautious. Kamal counters him not more cautious than the kids who don't even know their dad. This can be easily taken as a regular "PUNCH" in the movie but it was later linked to a broader/deeper meaning and pain of Afghan women through an old lady after the American attack. The old lady goes, first came the British, then Russians, then Talibans, then Americans and now you(referring to Omar). Expressing the sad story of Afhgan women being raped/used by many invaders. 
  • Omar says during the US attack, Americans will not attack women and children. right after he said, the women and children are bombed ripping the true colors of US which they exhibit in the name of trust.
  • In the news, Obama praises America and shares the happy news of Osama's killing while the running news in the bottom says Petroleum hike by 3% - World Alert. 

Critics are of different kinds and most of them do not even appreciate good cinema and truly go by its box office collection pattern. Good and very good critics stand by what they like and provide their observations based on their knowledge which again doesn't guarantee all the ideas and dimensions what the creator actually went through to convey. I am only imagining the sharpness of Kamal in achieving what he could with what is only observed leaving other ideas buried. I am very sure there are more subtle points and angles in the movie that are unearthed and I have a personal experience with his Hey Ram. I appreciate everytime i see it and find it fresh with every watch. There are not many such film makers around and even if you think you found one they could be only an aspirant of becoming one. A spy thriller is not an usual genre in Indian cinema and most of the movies made out are Bond kind that doesn't promise any values or education or a standpoint. Not that it is needed but that is what differentiates between a regular and special film maker. Kamal adopted this genre to explain the possibility of unusual events and to an extent avoid the questioning of the same despite being certain questions unanswered only hoping that he will answer them in its sequel. A huge lesson in the offering on how to present a genre and still woo the audiences keeping away unwanted comedy, romance, songs and what not.

Kamal has excelled so much as a writer/director/producer that even the brilliance of his acting is taken a back seat. The director in him has given enough confidence to the producer in him to convene all the top notch technicians to make his idea/dream realize. Top notch - cinematography in capturing those brilliant Afghanistan moments, Art direction recreating Afghanistan, Songs(Totally in love with it, cant remember any movie recently which fitted the songs as in this one), Special effects/Bomb blasts team, Performances of Kamal as an actor, Pooja, Rahul Bose and almost everyone.The remarkable quality I found in Kamal as a person is the way he handled himself during those "deplorable" episodes before the movie's release made me wonder if he had achieved what few could have in Himalayas. He truly stand by what he believes and he believes only in love without any obscurity. 

Verdict - 4/5. The bottom line is the director can hurt you bad if you are against non-violence, non-secular, love and compassion, deep-rooted orthodox nature which simply summarizes what Kamal as a person believes in and stands for. Many of the metaphors and analogies are lost for regular audiences but that doesn't mean to stop any creator from presenting it. This applies to any art, be it music, dance, movies, painting, literature etc. It is the choice of the audience to either simply ignore or strive to admire. Kamal Hassan is undoubtedly a premier writer/director(as well) in India. We often see "One Man Show" tag for many commercial heroes but honestly if at all that tag fits someone, it has to be Kamal Hassan. Vishwaroopam is a top notch effort and it will enthrall audiences who like multidimensional and intelligent cinema.

Disclaimer - I have taken many of the explanations to the scenes from many critical reviews and I couldn't able to compile it all either. I only chose the ones I liked and presented along with my thoughts and observations and would not like to take away any of their credits. This is presented merely for the reader for understanding in case if the reader is unaware. No plagiarism intended !!!


Sunday, February 3, 2013

Kadal - Darkness to Light !!!



 Mani Ratnam is one director who never ceased to attempt new genres of films right from start of his career. Kadal is also one such experiment, a tale that showcases the evil and demon in human minds and the fight between the two. Even though, this one liner can be applied to almost all the mainstream Indian movies, the treatment of the movie keeps Mani way taller than everyone else. Be it showing the helplessness, loneliness in a 5 yr old or portraying love deprived 8 year old or how an adult gets transformed into an outcast completely, only Mani can do it. 
Kadal has some brilliant moments in the form of Riveting portrayal of Thomas's(Goutham) character - His childhood struggle, his first sea experience in the boat, his first encounter of goodness(helping during the delivery), Arvind's(Sam) character - Portrayal of his resoluteness of the goodness in trying situations, and Arjun's(Bergmans) undramatic character portrayal of Satan. However, the huge problem is those brilliant moments never takes presence into the script and fails to captivate the audience. The story of Evil and Satan told with biblical references in the backdrop of fishermen lives is an interesting knot and waiting for that Mani magic but never came. It appeared every now and then it has come but fades away immediately leaves the audience dispirited.
Goutham gets a dream debut and his role is extremely demanding and as always Mani pulls it off quite convincingly from him. He is terrific and is sure to stay. Arvind is quite brilliant as the embodiment of goodness. He has amazing screen presence and hope the film makers make use of him more. Arjun has everything to freak out as Satan and he has underplayed extremely well. Thulasi’s character is the tricky one. Even though conceptually the character is an interesting one but it might not or doesn't go well with the audience and can be ridiculed. 
Mani Ratnam's penchant to make international theme movies and the complexity of the scripts attempted by him has always been inspiring. Despite flaws, Mani still doesn't alter his way of movie making for reclaiming his lost commercial success. However, it can be only seen as consoling factor. There are many jarring scenes that are uninteresting that goes against this movie despite its genre. A R Rahman's songs were already chart busters and provided the much needed buzz to the movie. Moongil Thottam and Eley Keechan were conceived and shot brilliantly. However instant hit Nenjukulle is not convincing and most importantly picturized on the wrong character. It was originally picturized on Celina's(Lakshmi Manchu) character which would have made more sense given the acclaimed lyrics. 
Rajeev Menon is clearly the star of the movie. His work truly is international and many lows in the movie were compensated. Each and every shot is a painting. Only stand out in the movie. 

Verdict - 3.25/5. The concept of an angel(Thulasi) brings light into the dark life of Goutham is probably the key angle which was mishandled and not Mani Ratnam'ised and thus made this movie falter leaving Kadal as arguably the weakest film made by Mani Ratnam till date. Carrying the reputation of being a master story teller failed to create the magic consecutively the second time disappoints not only his fans but also the general film buffs hoping he would come back strongly.